UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION

OFFICE OF SPECIAL EDUCATION AND REHABILITATIVE SERVICES

 

Letter of Inquiry - OSEP


I am writing in response to the letter to the Office of Special Education Programs ("OSEP") from you and your staff. Your inquiry is a followup to our recent letter to you and seeks further clarification of requirements in Part B of the Education of the Handicapped Act ("EHA- B") for providing extended school year services ("ESY") to children with handicapping conditions.

Your current letter poses four (4) questions. I will respond to them as follows:

Since EHA-B does not address a school district's obligation to provide a full continuum of placements, when providing ESY services, how can the LRE requirements at 34 CFR 300.550-300.556 apply, which require a full continuum at 300.551?

Each child who receives a free appropriate public education ("FAPE") under EHA-B, including children receiving ESY services, must be educated in the least restrictive setting in which the child's IEP can be implemented. 34 CFR 300.550(b); 300.552. Because ESY services are provided during a period of time when the full continuum of placements is not normally available for any students, the Department does not require States to ensure that a full continuum of placements is available solely for the purpose of providing ESY services. However, EHA-B does require that options on the continuum be made available to the extent necessary to implement a child's IEP. 34 CFR 300.552(b).

What's the distinction between: (a) School districts not being required to establish public programs for nonhandicapped children to meet the LRE provisions, and (b) School districts being required to purchase private placements when it's determined that interaction with nonhandicapped children is required?

The distinction is that in situation (a), a local education agency ("LEA") is not required to establish public programs for the purpose of providing ESY services if there are no public programs for nonhandicapped children during this time period. Under situation (b), an LEA would have to purchase a private school placement, if there was no available public placement, and the private placement was determined to be necessary to implement an individual child's IEP for ESY services.

If interaction with nonhandicapped children is the issue, and the private placments you are suggesting are setting for regular education students, (a) Is a school district required to purchase regular classroom settings from the private section in order to meet the LRE requirements, (b) What special education/specially designed instruction is being purchased, and (c) Can a school district use Federal special education funds to purchase a regular education program?

Regarding questions 3(a) and 3(b), the LEA is required to purchase private school placements in a regular education setting if they are required to implement a child's IEP. Each child's placement determination must be individualized and based upon the content of the IEP. 34 CFR 300.552(a)(2); 300.346(c).  OSEP recognizes that a child's IEP for ESY services will probably differ from the child's regular IEP, since the purpose of the ESY program is to prevent regression and recoupment problems. Therefore, the placement needed to implement the child's IEP for ESY services may differ from the child's placement during the regular school year.

Keeping this in mind, regarding question 3(c), if a determination is made that a private school is the appropriate placement in which to implement an IEP for ESY services, Federal funds can be used to pay for the services in that situation.

If center-based programs are the only options available within an LEA for ESY services, and no regular education services exist during the period ESY services are being provided, what modification would be required and could be made in the program in order to meet the LRE requirements?


The EHA-B does not address obligations of school districts to modify existing programs to ensure that a child's IEP for ESY services can be implemented. Instead, such matters are left to the discretion of State and local educational authorities. Therefore, any modifications which are necessary for center- based programming in order to implement a child's IEP for ESY services, must be determined on a case-by-case basis.

I hope this information is helpful. Please let us know if we can be of further assistance.

Judy A. Schrag, Ed.D., Director
Office of Special Education Programs
 


Requests for a copy of the original letter, or questions regarding the letter, may be directed to OSEP.  
 

Lost your way?  Try the Listen-Up Web Map or use our Search Engine.

The "Listen Up!" and "Talk It Up!" programs are copyright protected. All rights including the use of the "Listen Up!" and "Talk It Up!" logos are reserved. For more information about "Listen Up! and Talk It Up!" feel free to contact the author   

Request a link on Listen-Up!    Report a dead link